<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PROFESSOR RICHARD DAWKINS, ATHEIST, EVOLUTIONIST: Do his arguments make sense?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marymackillop.org/professor-richard-dawkins-athiest-evolutionist-do-his-arguments-make-sense/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marymackillop.org/professor-richard-dawkins-athiest-evolutionist-do-his-arguments-make-sense</link>
	<description>A weblog dedicated to Mary MacKillop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:25:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arnold Jago</title>
		<link>http://marymackillop.org/professor-richard-dawkins-athiest-evolutionist-do-his-arguments-make-sense/comment-page-1#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnold Jago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marymackillop.org/?p=1525#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Marius,
Thanks for the comment.
(1) I have read &quot;The Blind Watchmaker&quot;.
(2) To talk about fundamentalism, we would need a definition of what the word means. I think most people who identify as &quot;fundamentalists&quot; have an attitude to the Bible which makes it impossible to consider the world having existed more than a few thousand years. As you can see, I am not one of them. It is they whom I am mainly criticising.
(3) Many people who are skeptical about evolution are illogical, in my opinion, because they have been duped by the other side, the eco-fans (eg Prof Dawkins), into believing that any concession towards a belief in evolution has to involve denying God. They think the same way as whoever dreamed up the graphic placed at the end of the post. And I am telling such people to &quot;think a bit harder&quot; -- as per the title when you move the cursor onto it.
I hope I have made myself clearer this time.
Arnold Jago</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marius,<br />
Thanks for the comment.<br />
(1) I have read &#8220;The Blind Watchmaker&#8221;.<br />
(2) To talk about fundamentalism, we would need a definition of what the word means. I think most people who identify as &#8220;fundamentalists&#8221; have an attitude to the Bible which makes it impossible to consider the world having existed more than a few thousand years. As you can see, I am not one of them. It is they whom I am mainly criticising.<br />
(3) Many people who are skeptical about evolution are illogical, in my opinion, because they have been duped by the other side, the eco-fans (eg Prof Dawkins), into believing that any concession towards a belief in evolution has to involve denying God. They think the same way as whoever dreamed up the graphic placed at the end of the post. And I am telling such people to &#8220;think a bit harder&#8221; &#8212; as per the title when you move the cursor onto it.<br />
I hope I have made myself clearer this time.<br />
Arnold Jago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marius</title>
		<link>http://marymackillop.org/professor-richard-dawkins-athiest-evolutionist-do-his-arguments-make-sense/comment-page-1#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marymackillop.org/?p=1525#comment-832</guid>
		<description>One assumes that, like most fundamentalists, you haven&#039;t bothered to read any of Dawkins&#039; work, and you are just parrotting others&#039; thoughts and musings.
Just to eliminate a standard creationist reply to this question: Yes, I have read the Bible.
&quot;The average evolution-skeptic probably doesn’t know that his/her thoughts are illogical&quot;
How so? By what process did you arrive at this conclusion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One assumes that, like most fundamentalists, you haven&#8217;t bothered to read any of Dawkins&#8217; work, and you are just parrotting others&#8217; thoughts and musings.<br />
Just to eliminate a standard creationist reply to this question: Yes, I have read the Bible.<br />
&#8220;The average evolution-skeptic probably doesn’t know that his/her thoughts are illogical&#8221;<br />
How so? By what process did you arrive at this conclusion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

