‘Suffering’ Category Archives
Locked-in syndrome is where a patient has mental awareness but, due to nervous system disease, is physically paralysed from the eyelids down.
In some cases the eyelids don’t work either.
By using non-invasive computer interface technology, which detects changes of oxygen levels in brain tissue, even the worst cases can now be communicated with….
…including asking them whether they are happy.
Interestingly, most of them say they are happy with their lives.
We might have expected them to be very frustrated.
But they aren’t.
It makes you ask yourself what “happy” really means.
Apparently it doesn’t necessarily mean getting everything you want.
Or fulfilling yourself by “following your dreams etc.”
Locked-in patients stay happy by adapting themselves – not to their dreams – but to reality here and now.
It’s what you might call accepting God’s will.
We aren’t going to understand God, but we can learn to trust him….
Here’s a video made by the daughter of a Rabbi who has experienced the condition:
Victorian state MPs may soon participate in a “conscience vote” about legalising euthanasia by doctor-assisted suicide.
What do these people think “conscience” means?
For most it seems to mean “what I feel comfortable with”.
Being comfortable is a feeling — not the same as using one’s intelligence or willing good to another person.
If you’re uncomfortable witnessing somebody in a weakened or undignified state or having to bear incompletely-controlled pain, there’s a simple, only-too-obvious solution — kill that person or help him/her suicide.
Less convenient is the alternative — the attention to detail of good nursing and medication-dosage plus one-to-one spiritual support in facing the lonely truth of the situation.
Traditionally “conscience” means putting into practice what is one’s best understanding of Moral Truth — seeking the best possible fulfilment of the person of the sufferer, given the present situation.
Why? Because we love that person.
By contrast, killing is a cop-out.
In early 2016, a Victorian man with advanced tongue cancer was offered Nembutal (illegal lethal tablets) by euthanasia-promoting doctor, Dr Rodney Syme.
The patient’s GP complained and the Medical Board of Victoria put a ban on Dr Syme from practising end-of-life patient care – describing him as a “serious risk”.
Dr Syme appealed to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) which has reversed the ban.
Assisting a patient to commit suicide is against the law in Victoria and carries a 5-year prison sentence.
That is an excellent law, designed to protect vulnerable people from falling into the hands of the euthanasia types — while, hopefully, accessing care from proper palliative care doctors.
The Victorian government plans to reverse that law — a bad move which would endanger the frail, the despairing, the weak and the elderly.
THEY WANT YOU TO ACCEPT THE NOTION OF EUTHANASIA AS BEING “MERCIFUL” AND A “RIGHT”: think about it. resist emotivist rhetoric.
by Arnold Jago in Common Sense, Death, Ethics, Health, Suffering
In 50 years of practising medicine, including in the third world, often with no palliative care practitioner or any other doctor available to discuss near-death care, I only ever had one serious request for euthanasia.
This patient did, in fact, find another doctor to consult. I never heard the outcome.
I think Australia’s media cover the euthanasia issue badly.
They imply that without legal euthanasia, patients will be left in artificially-prolonged suffering when already irretrievably in the process of dying.
This falsifies what opponents of euthanasia are saying.
I think the truth is best summed this way:
“An act or omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator….
“Discontinuing medical procedures that are burdensome, dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate to the expected outcome can be legitimate; it is the refusal of ‘over-zealous’ treatment. Here one does not will death; one’s inability to impede it is merely accepted….”
(quote from Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2277-2278)
White Ribbon Day?
The day we’re told yet again that domestic violence is bad and that men shouldn’t hit women.
Which is true enough.
But why no mention of female-inflicted violence and cruelty?
If a man is slapped, belittled, spat upon, given the silence treatment, lied about — where can he turn?
No bruises, lacerations etc. to show.
If he suicides, the statistic won’t be acknowledged as caused by female domestic abuse.
As a doctor, I have come across this only too often.
If you have doubts, ask your own GP.
Every political party seems to say the same things:
“We’re the party of change.”
“We’re the party for small business.”
“We’re the party to create more jobs.”
Hang on a minute…. Are more jobs good? Always?
Does the local baby want mummy gone to a job (a job not looking after local baby)?
More jobs – spelt as above – are a two-edged sword.
What we do need is more Jobs (spelt with a capital “J”).
As per the Bible. Read the Book of Job. You’ll seldom find a better story.
It’s about re-considering our grievances re God permitting suffering — in the context of God’s almighty goodness.
Also how the only ethics that can change the world are the ethics of Virtue.
Virtues including Faith, Hope, Love, Fortitude, Temperance and Justice. Plus — last-but-not-least — Prudence.
The Prophet Job had these virtues.
We need more Jobs — more people like Job.
Soon, before everybody is blown up or beheaded.
Or falls asleep in front of the TV.