‘Politics’ Category Archives

20
Mar

VICTORIAN SCHOOL TEACHERS THREATEN TO STRIKE: lessons to be learned.

by Arnold Jago in Education, Ethics, Justice, Politics, Youth

Victorian schoolteachers are threatening industrial action if not granted the pay rises they want.

They’ve been offered 7.5 percent increase over the next 3 years. But they want 10 percent.

Failing that, says Australian Education Union representative, Mary Bluett, they will consider going on strike.

The teachers must feel encouraged by the fact that the government they are trying to pressurise only a matter of days ago caved in to similar threats from the nursing profession.

M. Bluett says, “It (going on strike) is not something we like to do. We don’t like to leave our students . . . .”

If they don’t like it, why do it?

They must like it a little bit.

* * *

If the teachers’ demands are just . . . .

(Are they? If granted, they would make Victoria’s teachers the highest paid in Australia . . . .)

Anyway, even if the demands were just, aren’t there other ways to influence the government?

Could they not try non-cooperation with paper-work of some kind — or refuse some forms of non-teaching duties normally undertaken outside classroom hours?

If you are a teacher, you are teaching all the time.

If you go on strike, you are still teaching . . . .

. . . teaching students that the way to get what you want is to inconvenience others however much it takes to get them to knuckle under.

19
Mar

BOB KATTER: getting the Pauline H treatment.

by Arnold Jago in Australia, Ethics, Family, Lifestyle, Media, Money, Politics

BOB Katter’s Australian Party (KAP) has been condemned by the Queensland Council of Unions over a so-called “homophobic” TV advertisement.

But the advertisement mocks, not so much people with same-sex orientations, as opposition leader Campbell Newman’s unwillingness to spell out his real stance on marriage.

Mr Newman — typical major-party politician — fears offending either side over this divisive issue.

* * *

The media say this issue and this advertisement are “isolating” Mr Katter and his party.

Bob Katter doesn’t mind being isolated — that’s why he is a genuine alternative to the big  parties.

The big parties intend to not only isolate Mr Katter but to destroy him.

Likewise Coles and Woolworths — loaded with money.

The KAP threatens to end their longstanding duopoly over Australian families’ food upply.

They will happily underwrite any campaign to kill off the KAP — no matter how many millions or billions of dollars it takes.

Such attempted character assassination might backfire.

Many people admire Bob Katter — even those unimpressed by his white hat and his determination to be a “character”.

15
Mar

“MERCY KILLING” OF SICK HUMANS: is it mercy or is it murder?

by Arnold Jago in Death, Ethics, Health, Politics, Suffering

Englishman, Tony Nicklinson, 58, has “locked-in syndrome” following a stroke in 2005.

Locked-in syndrome means being  totally paralysed (except for eye movements) while remaining fully conscious.

Such person are incapable of carrying out their own suicide.

Mr Nicklinson has been granted permission by a High Court judge to take to a full hearing his request for legal protection for any doctor who agrees to kill him.

The Ministry of Justice opposes granting this request — because it would would authorise murder, bypassing parliament and changing the law.

* * *

It’s hard for the rest of us to imagine what the syndrome would feel like.

Moments of death-wish would be natural — we all become fretful when unable to get our own way.

However killing an innocent human being is wrong.

Our responsibility is to make the existence of persons like Mr Nicklinson as tolerable as possible, sparing no effort.

13
Mar

FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: thought police and the culture of death in Australia.

by Arnold Jago in Abortion, Australia, Death, Ethics, Politics

In 2008, Victoria’s Labor government passed its “Abortion Law Reform Act” (ALRA) legalising late-term abortions up to, and including, nine months.

Plus abolishing a doctor’s right to exercise a conscientious objection to involvement in abortion:

“If a woman requests a registered health practitioner to advise on a proposed abortion, or to perform, direct, authorise or supervise an abortion for that woman, and the practitioner has a conscientious objection to abortion, the practitioner must . . . refer the woman to another registered health practitioner . . . who the practitioner knows does not have a conscientious objection . . . .” (Section 8, ALRA 2008)

* * *

What about Victoria’s Charter of Human Rights (VCHRA) — doesn’t it provide that:

Every person has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief . . . .” ? (VCHRA section 14)

Keep reading . . . .

VCHRA section 48 says: “Nothing in this Charter affects any law applicable to abortion or child destruction . . . .”

Snookered.

The Coalition parties, in government in Victoria for 15 months now, still haven’t bothered to restore doctors’ freedom of conscience.

11
Mar

BOB KATTER: a real alternative, probably.

by Arnold Jago in Australia, Common Sense, Environment, Money, Politics

The Katter Australian Party today launched its campaign for the March 24 Queensland state election.

The KAP hopes to be a genuine third force in Australian politics.

They seem to be the only party which plans to create a biofuels-based ethanol industry.

Mr Katter quotes countries like Brazil, the USA and Europe, which have lowered their electricity costs and motor fuel costs by this means.

Ethanol fuels are also better for the environment and for urban-dwellers’ lungs.

Mr Katter’s ideas re abolishing the supermarkets duopoly and banning banana imports are plain common sense.

What about the KAP accepting Casino-billionaire James Packer’s $250,000 donation the other day?

Casinos are intimately linked with crime and with life-destroying effects on problem gamblers . . . so we still have no party with a truly balanced social philosophy.

But the KAP is the best of a bad lot.

8
Mar

HAPPY INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY: a contradiction in terms?

by Arnold Jago in Politics, Women

The concept of International Women’s Day (IWD) was invented just over 100 years ago by Communists in USA and Germany.

The choice of March 8 was made by the Russian Bolsheviks after the 1917 October Revolution.

Since 1977, the United Nations has promoted IWD — this year nominating its theme as “Women’s Empowerment”.

IWD organisers, even in non-Communist countries, love employing Communist-style policies and lingo when boosting it.

* * *

The Australian Labor Party used IWD 2012 to promise, yet again, state recognition of homosexual coupling — terrible news for a future generation of children if they succeed.

The Liberal-National Coalition likewise used the occasion to promise a “paid parental leave” scheme which will ensure that next generation’s toddlers won’t see much of their mothers.

The annual March 8 event might be better called, not IWD, but IACD (International Anti-Child Day).