Journalist, Dylan Welch, (The Age, October 12, 2011) quoted an ASIO report suggesting that Australia harbours “a persistent but small sub-culture of racist and nationalist extremists”.

He went on to talk about Norwegian terrorist, Anders Breivik, being “a Christian who described himself as a ‘modern-day crusader’”.

In his manifesto, “2083 — A European Declaration of Independence”, Brievik did write:

“Myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God. We do however believe in Christianity as a cultural, social, identity and moral platform. This makes us Christian . . . Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I’m not an excessively religious man.”

But Christianity (as taught by Christ himself) says that the first Commandment is to love God with all one’s heart and soul.

To be a Christian, one’s every political idea and act must be motivated by that relationship.

This key point was missed by Anders Breivik (and, perhaps, by Dylan Welch).

Robert Jeffress, a supporter of would-be Republican candidate for the US Presidency, Rick Perry, has caused a stir.

He says that opposing candidate Mitt Romney — a Mormon– is “not a Christian”.

He labels Mormonism a “cult”.

Mr Jeffress is pastor of a Baptist 10,000-member “mega church”.

Question: are Baptist mega churches Christian?

Anyway, the Democrats are enjoying watching the Republicans undermining each others’ credibility.

And the secular media are bleating about more “separation of Church and State”.

And “keeping religion out of politics”.

* * *

Yes, there must be a degree of “separation of Church and State” – or we’ll end up with injustice.

Two examples:

(1) State-dominating-Church as in China: where the government interferes with the appointment of Catholic bishops.

(2) Church-dominating-State as in Egypt: where today and tomorrow people are shot to pieces or run over by tanks for being non-Muslims.

But “keeping religion out of politics” is something else.

Keeping religion out of politics is not possible.

Without true religion, how does one determine right from wrong?

Without true religion, those getting in your way merit no special respect, being simply animals/robots who, if inconvenient, can be thrust aside or disassembled.

* * *

Think about the practical questions of surrogate pregnancy, abortion, human cloning, euthanasia, same sex “marriage”, business fraud etc.

On issues like these, Mr Romney has been willing to flexibly adopt whatever stance seems politically expedient.

A Catholic cannot do that.

If he tries it, his bishop must discipline him — and, if necessary, excommunicate him.

If not, that bishop must, himself, be attended to by somebody acting for the Pope.

During September, a 15-person group of archaeologists from Flinders University did some digging in Penola at the site of the first school set up there by Mother Mary MacKillop in 1866.

They found about 50 relics, including an 1839 coin, a thimble, a marble, a lamp base and what seem to be writing slates and slate pencils.

Local organiser of Penola’s “Mary MacKillop Interpretive Centre”, Claire Larkin, says the number of visitors to Penola seeking info about Saint MMK is up 20 percent on last year:

“People are just taken with the story and they are finding they can learn a lot more in Penola.”

* * *

Are they? We should all learn more about Saint Mary of the Cross.

If we were all more like Saint M, Australia would be a happier, more just and more holy place.

A visit to Penola might help(?)

Reading her writings certainly would — available through any religious bookstore.

Readers will discover that she isn’t quite like what we’ve been told.

She was no rebel, no multiculturalist . . . .

 She was thoroughly Catholic — a traditionalist —  nothing whatever in common with the spirit of the 1960s Second Vatican Council.

Shortly before she died, she wrote, “I have not changed with the times, and with God’s help, never shall.”

The MK minders at Penola and the whole hierarchy of the Australian Church may try to modify and modernise her message — but we should try to avoid being duped.

God will find ways to get the real message of Saint Mary MacKillop through to the people of Australia . . . in his own time and in his own way.

Independent federal MP, Andrew Wilkie, threatens to stop supporting the Gillard government if they do not legislate poker machine reform.

He wants gamblers using high-intensity machines (which accept $10 bets) to be compelled to set a limit on their losses before they start playing.

When their loss reaches the cap the machine will lock them out.

Low intensity machines (accepting $1 bets only) will not be capped.

At present, Australia has 200,000 high intensity poker machines.

Gamblers routinely lose about $1200 per hour on them.

* * *

Mr Wilkie and fellow anti-pokies MP, Senator Xenophon, have been meeting church leaders, seeking their moral support.

Let’s watch the “Salvation Army”, which depends on handouts from non-members — especially community clubs — to survive.

The clubs are hinting that if the Salvos keep interfering with their exploitation of the vulnerable poor, they will withhold their donations.

The Catholic Church has no cred whatever on this issue, running its own bingo and poker machine-dependent clubs.

Likewise the AFL. Embarrassed to look as sociopathic as the NRL, they mumble about preferring “education” to capping . . . .

Money seems to speak all languages.

* * *

Wilkie and Xeno are themselves a bit suspect, too – they probably have no experience olf being poor — and probably rarely meet anybody non-affluent.

Their willingness for $1 dollar, “low-intensity”, machines to go un-capped shows their remoteness from reality.

Low-intensity pokie patrons can lose $120 per hour.

For them, that is big money — the cash left for paying bills and feeding the family is decimated.

Common sense demands that all poker machines be capped.

Clubs that cannot survive without poker machines should not survive.

Churches should preach that gambling is greed — and incompatible with love for God and his vulnerable children.

Pope Benedict, visiting his home country, Germany, has paid tribute to those who kept the faith during Nazi and Communist persecutions.

After meeting a group of victims of past sexual abuse by church workers, he humbly commented that he could “understand that, in the face of such reports, people, especially those close to victims, would say, ‘This isn’t my church anymore’.”

He vowed that the Church will “deal with all crimes of abuse” and is “committed to promotion of measures for the protection of children and young people”.

* * *

In a world where hatred seems to reign, to learn the message of God’s love is urgent and critical.

The people you meet every day need to discover that they are infinitely lovable, no matter how badly they feel about themselves.

And to experience the life-altering potency of God’s love.

It is the task of the Church to be God’s agent in passing on that message and that transforming experience of love.

Now is not the time for Christians to abandon the Church, but to redouble our efforts, at the personal level, to spread God’s life-changing love.

* * *

Today, try to let everyone you meet be aware of his/her lovability.

All are infinitely loveable, because God loves all infinitely.

We must first let God’s love change us — then endeavour to become change-agents in creating and spreading love.

It is not easy to act consistently with this kind of love.

None of us is as good at it as we ought to be.

If we humbly ask God for his grace, he will change us – and use the change in us as a step towards changing the world.

The US Military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy no longer exists, since its formal repeal as from 20 September.

This policy was a compromise, introduced 17 years ago under President Clinton, regarding the potential problems of having homosexually-active persons in the military.

* the “Don’t Ask” part was an attempt at fairness to people with homosexual orientation – not asking them, during medical and psychological assessments of fitness to enlist, about their “sexuality”. Previously some had been rejected on those grounds.

* the “Don’t Tell” part was an understanding that homosexually-inclined members of the forces not speak about their inclinations — nor indulge in homosexual conduct — the penalty being discharge from the service.

* there were also implied “Don’t Pursue” and “Don’t Harass” guidelines: service personnel being investigated (pursued) re homosexuality only if their openness about it was blatant –and they were not to be subjected to persecution or violence (harassed) by other troops.

* * *

Polls suggest that probably a majority of Americans favour the repeal.

However Archbishop Broglio, head Catholic military chaplain, favoured retaining “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”.

The basic Catholic position remains, of course, the same.

Namely that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.”

Presidential hopeful, Rick Perry, has written, “I respect their right to engage in the individual behaviour of their choosing, but they must respect the rights of millions of Americans who refuse to normalise their behaviour . . . Tolerance is a two-way street.”

If Perry perseveres with this stance — and if he becomes President — “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” may well be reinstated.