March 15th, 2010 Archives
Mar
GENDER-SELECTION FOR IVF COUPLES? A death sentence for the unwanted
by Arnold Jago in Australia, Ethics, Lifestyle, Politics
Normally about 106 human baby boys are born for every 100 girls.
It seems to be a permanent feature of the human blueprint.
More boy babies die young than girl babies and, by puberty, numbers of males and females are about equal.
* * *
But things change — in China during the years 2000-2004 the ratio was 124 boys for every 100 girls.
Soon, within ten years, one in five young men in China will be unable to find a bride because of the shortage of young women – a thing biologically impossible without human interference.
It results from increasingly available prenatal sex-determination technology.
* * *
Meanwhile Australia’s Health and Medical Research Council is reviewing whether to allow parents using In Vitro Fertilisation to select their baby’s gender — illegal at present except when there is a risk of parents passing on genetic diseases.
Federal Health Minister, Nicola Roxon, says the Government has no plans to overturn the ban. “On a personal level I am very apprehensive about such a change,” she says.
Fair enough. Wouldn’t any normal person find the concept revoltingly impossible to contemplate?
Not IVF specialist Professor Gab Kovacs. He calls such objections “ridiculous”.
He says, “If a couple are determined enough to go through IVF rather than natural pregnancy to have a child of one particular sex, then it’s possible that if they have a child of the opposite sex, that child may not be as appreciated and well looked after.”
* * *
Yes, we have forgotten how revolting and perverse IVF itself intrinsically is.
At any one time there are about 120,000 fertilised eggs being kept frozen in Australia’s 50-plus fertility clinics.
At present outcome rates, about 105,000 of these will end up dead – many simply discarded after their use-by date.
Is not each and every embryo a genetically-complete and unique human being?
Is not the death of any such human being — insofar as it results by the intention of those responsible — an act of murder?
Not a popular thought at sentimental level. But can it be faulted, logic-wise?


